We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Richard A. Duncan Faegre Baker Daniels

Results 1 to 5 of 8



Supreme Court decides Comcast Corp. v. Behrend *

USA - March 27 2013
On March 27, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Comcast Corp. v. Behrend, No. 11-864, holding that, in determining whether common…

Co-authors: Aaron D. Van Oort , Charles F. Webber .


Comcast Corp. v. Behrend—Supreme Court tightens class certification standards for proof of impact and damages *

USA - March 27 2013
Today, in a much anticipated decision, the Supreme Court determined that lower federal courts may not certify a class action without assessing…

Co-authors: Jeffrey S. Roberts , Aaron D. Van Oort .


Supreme Court decides FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. *

USA - February 19 2013
In 1941, Georgia enacted the Hospital Authorities Law, which authorized the state's counties and municipalities to create public entities called…

Co-authors: Kathy L. Osborn, Sarah C. Jenkins .


Supreme Court clears the way for a lawsuit over the federal government's land acquisition for the Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians *

USA - June 18 2012
On June 18, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court of the United States decided Match-E-Be-Nash-She-Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak and Salazar v. Patchak, 567 U.S. ___ (2012).

Co-authors: Aaron J. Harkins , Kent E. Richey, Leah R. Sixkiller.


Eighth Circuit decision further clarifies the principle of tribal sovereign immunity *

USA - April 9 2012
On April 4, 2012, in Alltell Communications, LLC v. DeJordy, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that a third-party subpoena in private civil litigation is a "suit" for purposes of an Indian tribe's common law sovereign immunity, thus requiring waiver or congressional abrogation of that immunity before compliance with the subpoena may be compelled.

Co-authors: Leah R. Sixkiller.


Next »