We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Keith R. Derrington Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

Results 1 to 5 of 8



Patent fast lanes now open despite holiday rush! *

USA - December 27 2011
The Patent community should celebrate as the U.S. Patent Office has sent a wonderful holiday present to finish out the year.

Co-authors: Justin K. Murray, Michael D. Pegues, Jeffrey S. Whittle, Constance Gall Rhebergen, Jeffrey B. Swartz.


Director Kappos gives early holiday present to patent owners of "green technology" *

USA - November 22 2010
Green technology patent owners will have something extra to be thankful for this coming holiday season.

Co-authors: Justin K. Murray, Jeffrey S. Whittle, Ashley L. Kirk, Israel Garcia, Jr..


Lid blown off patent false marking claim *

USA - June 16 2010
The Federal Circuit blew the lid off a plaintiff's false patent marking suit in the most recent patent case interpreting the patent false marking statute.

Co-authors: Justin K. Murray, Jeffrey S. Whittle, Ashley L. Kirk.


Qualifying barriers lower for "green technology" patent applications *

USA - June 15 2010
Barriers have been lowered significantly for what now qualifies as "Green Technology" subject matter for patent applications pending before the US Patent and Trademark Office ("Patent Office").

Co-authors: Justin K. Murray, Jeffrey S. Whittle, Ashley L. Kirk, Israel Garcia, Jr..


Penalty for patent false marking set at highest sales price *

USA - May 11 2010
Following remand from the Federal Circuit in the Forest Group vs. Bon Tool false marking patent case, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled on April 27, 2010 that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for falsely marking a product with an incorrect patent number would be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold instead of assessing the penalty based on the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant for marking the product.

Co-authors: Justin K. Murray, Jeffrey S. Whittle, Ashley L. Kirk.


Next »