We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

William Gaede McDermott Will & Emery

Results 1 to 5 of 11



Prometheus redux: patentability of isolated DNA sequences are patentable subject matter *

USA - September 28 2012
Isolated DNA molecules are patent-eligible, reaffirmed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, lifting a cloud of uncertainty over DNA composition patents—at least for now.

Co-authors: Bhanu K. Sadasivan, Ph.D..


District court power to enjoin improper use code is limited *

USA - August 30 2012
Addressing for the first time the role of a district court to remedy an improper use code submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a federal court’s powers are limited to enjoining an improper use code and that the party is “given the opportunity to propose the specific language of the use code.”


Federal Circuit breathes life back into DNA patents *

USA - August 21 2012
A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit endorsed patent-eligibility of DNA molecules in a decision much awaited by the biotechnology community.

Co-authors: Bhanu K. Sadasivan, Ph.D..


Supreme Court: generic drug manufacturers have counterclaim right to correct improper use codes *

USA - May 30 2012
The U.S. Supreme Court has now addressed for the first time the scope of a statutory provision authorizing generic drug companies to counterclaim in Hatch-Waxman litigation against a branded company to correct or delete patent information submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and listed in the Orange Book.


Supreme Court rules in Prometheus: patent claims must recite “significantly more” than a law of nature *

USA - March 22 2012
In a move that could have a significant impact on the fields of personalized medicine and medical diagnostics, the Supreme Court of the United States recently held claims to a blood test were invalid because they did not define patent-eligible subject matter.

Co-authors: Robert H. Underwood, K. Nicole Clouse, Ph.D..


Next »