We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Gregory D. Yoder McDermott Will & Emery

Results 1 to 5 of 6



Obviousness ruling reversed for failure to analyze why references should be combined *

USA - January 31 2013
Addressing the issues of anticipation and obviousness, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a district court's…


Federal Circuit considers plain meaning, specification and prosecution history to construe claims *

USA - June 28 2012
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s claim construction ruling based on the plain meaning of the claim phrase, the specification and the prosecution history.


Reexamined claims do not create a new cause of action *

USA - April 30 2012
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a district court ruling that claims that emerge from a reexamination do not create a new cause of action that did not exist before.


Internet advertising method found to be patent-eligible *

USA - October 31 2011
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a method for distributing online media to consumers by having the consumer first watch a paid advertisement constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.


Defendant not allowed to appeal denial of a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss after trial *

USA - September 30 2011
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that a defendant cannot appeal a pretrial denial of a FRCP Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss after the plaintiff has successfully prevailed at trial on the claim at issue because the sufficiency of the allegations in the complaint is irrelevant.


Next »