We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

G. Matthew McCloskey McDermott Will & Emery

Results 1 to 5 of 27



Expert witness testimony normally improper for Preliminary Response *

USA - February 25 2015
Clarifying what is impermissible "new" evidence for a Patent Owner Preliminary Response in an Inter Partes Review (IPR), the Patent Trial and Appeal…


Prior declaratory judgment action fatal to CBM petitioner *

USA - January 29 2015
In a decision bringing four instituted Covered Business Method (CBM) review proceedings to a full stop, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or…


PTAB issues rare dissent in non-institution decision *

USA - December 30 2014
In a decision denying institution of an inter partes review (IPR), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB or…


PTAB expands discovery for inter partes review *

USA - November 26 2014
In a decision that has the potential to expand the scope of permissible discovery in inter partes reviews (IPRs) as well as other post-grant…


PTAB designates seven recent decisions as informative *

USA - October 29 2014
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently designated seven decisions from Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings as informative opinions: ZTE…


Next »